Comparison of Parametrization Methods of Electroglottographic and Inverse Filtered Acoustic Speech Pressure Signals in Distinguishing Between Phonation Types

Biomedical Signal Processing and Control - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.bspc.2017.04.001
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

On the Use of the Derivative of Electroglottographic Signals for Characterization of Nonpathological Phonation

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2004English

Acoustic Correlates of Non‐modal Phonation in Telephone Speech

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2005English

Comparison of Methods for Rhythm Analysis of Complex Animals’ Acoustic Signals

PLoS Computational Biology
Molecular NeuroscienceEvolutionEcologyGeneticsBehaviorMolecular BiologySystematicsSimulationCellularComputational TheoryMathematicsModeling
2020English

A Comparison of Four Methods for Distinguishing Doppler Signals From Gaseous and Particulate Emboli

Stroke
CardiologyNeurologyCardiovascular MedicineAdvancedMedicineNeuroscienceSpecialized Nursing
1998English

Comparison Between Sprint Training Methods in Different Types of Athletes

2019English

Distinguishing Between Retention Signals and Degrons Acting in ERAD

Journal of Cell Science
Cell Biology
2007English

Fundamental Frequency Estimation of Low-Quality Electroglottographic Signals

Journal of Voice
OtorhinolaryngologyLPNLVNSpeechHearing
2019English

A Wavelet-Based Filtration Method of Noisy Technological Acoustic and Speech Signals

Problems of Information Technology
2018English

Relation Between Amplitude and Duration of Acoustic Emission Signals

AIP Conference Proceedings
AstronomyPhysics
2003English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy