The Mesh Debate: Transvaginal Anterior Anchored Mesh Should Not Be Abandoned

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology - United States
doi 10.1111/ajo.12589
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Response toThe Mesh Debate: Transvaginal Anterior Anchored Mesh Should Not Be Abandoned

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Transvaginal Mesh: Let's Not Repeat the Mistakes of the Past

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Response to ‘Transvaginal Mesh: Let's Not Repeat the Mistakes of the Past’

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Commentary on “Lightweight Transvaginal Mesh Is Associated With Lower Mesh Exposure Rates Than Heavyweight Mesh” by Dykes Et Al.

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2020English

Medicolegal Basics and Update on Transvaginal Mesh in Canada

Canadian Urological Association Journal
Urology
2017English

Plastic Operations or the Transvaginal Mesh. Are We Going Full Circle?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

Science Should Not Be Abandoned in a Bid to Resolve Whaling Disputes

Biology Letters
AgriculturalBiological Sciences
2009English

Canadian Urological Association Position Statement on the Use of Transvaginal Mesh

Canadian Urological Association Journal
Urology
2017English

Symptom Resolution After Operative Management of Complications From Transvaginal Mesh

Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy