Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 1: Difference of the AIC Values Between Various Models Predicting Observed Interaction Frequencies and the Model With Lowest AIC Value.

doi 10.7717/peerj.2789/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 1: AIC Table Comparing Model Fits for Example Datasets.

English

Table 4: AIC and ΔAIC Values of Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares (PGLS) Models.

English

Problems and Prospects of Investment in Aic

Proceedings of Scientific Works of Cherkasy State Technological University. Series: Economic Sciences
2015English

Table S1: Values of the Model Selection Criteria AIC and BIC for a Unimodal and Bimodal Distribution for 50%, 75% and 90% of the Data.

English

Figure 4: Plot of the Akaike Weights for Exponent-Pairs With B = 1, Using the Least AIC Amongst Generalized Bertalanffy-Models (Red) and the Least AIC Amongst All Considered Models (Blue); All AICs Using K = 4.

English

History and Present Status of AIC

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi)
Electronic EngineeringElectrical
1981English

AIC-Based Selection of Growth Models: The Case of Piglets From Organic Farming

Open Journal of Modelling and Simulation
2016English

Engineering, Energy, Transport Aic

English

Review of AIC Color 81 Berlin

Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Institute of Japan (Shomei Gakkai Shi)
Electronic EngineeringElectrical
1982English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy