Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 29: Strict Consensus Tree of 120 Most Parsimonious Trees of 1,269 Steps, a Consistency Index of 0.340 and a Retention Index of 0.630.
doi 10.7717/peerj.7240/fig-29
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 54: Strict Consensus Tree of 85 Most Parsimonious Trees (MPTs) of Length 1,264, a Retention Index of 0.636 and a Consistency Index of 0.346.
Figure 6: Strict Consensus of Three Most Parsimonious Trees.
Figure 8: Majority-Rule Consensus of Six Most Parsimonious Trees.
Figure 28: Reduced Consensus Tree From Our Phylogenetic Analysis After pruningXuanhanosaurususing 3,070 Most Parsimonious Trees.
Figure 10: Strict Consensus of the 11 Most Parsimonious Trees Found in the Present Analysis, Not Showing Protorosaurus Speneri and Prolacerta Browni.
Figure 16: Strict Consensus of Eight Most Parsimonious Trees Resulting From Analysis That Includes Banhxeochelys Trani as the Only Active Fossil Species.
Table 4: Consistency Index (CI), Retention Index (RI) and ‘Tree-Lengths’ of the Four Phylogenetic Trees Corresponding to the Four Data Treatments.
Figure S2: The Strict Consensus Tree of Analysis 1
Figure S8: The Strict Consensus Tree of Analysis 3