Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Bayes Factor Design Analysis: Planning for Compelling Evidence

SSRN Electronic Journal
doi 10.2139/ssrn.2722435
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

January 1, 2016

Authors
Felix D. SchhnbrodtEric-Jan Wagenmakers
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

GRB 130603B: No Compelling Evidence for Neutron Star Merger

Advances in Astronomy
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
2015English

Table 1: Bayes Factor Analysis of Experiment 1.

English

4142 Analysis of Planning for Space Building(Design and Planning)

Transactions of the Architectural Institute of Japan Summaries of Technical Papers
1967English

Empirical Bayes Methods for Dynamic Factor Models

Review of Economics and Statistics
EconomicsEconometricsSocial Sciences
2017English

Science Journalism Can Be Evidence-Based, Compelling — And Wrong

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Compelling Interest Cacodoxy: Why the Contraception Mandate Fails RFRA's Compelling Interest Analysis

University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Law
2017English

Computing Bayes Factors for Evidence-Accumulation Models Using Warp-Iii Bridge Sampling

2018English

Using Bayes Factors to Evaluate Evidence for No Effect: Examples From the Sips Project

Addiction
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2017English

The Sustainability System Design for Urban Planning

DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy