Author-Suggested Reviewers: Gender Differences and Influences on the Peer Review Process at an Ecology Journal

Functional Ecology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/1365-2435.12665
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Should Authors Suggest Reviewers? A Comparative Study of the Performance of Author-Suggested and Editor-Selected Reviewers at a Biological Journal

Learned Publishing
Communication
2018English

Retaining and Rewarding Journal Peer Reviewers

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2018English

Peer Review and Reviewers

Powder Diffraction
InstrumentationRadiationCondensed Matter PhysicsMaterials Science
1996English

Author Experiences With the IS Journal Review Process

Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Information Systems
2004English

The Effects of an Editor Serving as One of the Reviewers During the Peer-Review Process

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2016English

Journal Self-Citation XIII: The Ethics of Influencing the Peer Review Process – An Essay

Communications of the Association for Information Systems
Information Systems
2009English

A Scoping Review on the Roles and Tasks of Peer Reviewers in the Manuscript Review Process in Biomedical Journals

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2019English

Strengthening the Peer Review Process for the International Journal of Toxicology

International Journal of Toxicology
Toxicology
2014English

Peer Review at the British Journal of Family Planning

Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
2000English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy