Preferences and Values for Forests and Wetlands: A Comparison of Farmers, Environmentalists, and the General Public in Australia

Society and Natural Resources - United Kingdom
doi 10.1080/08941920590947986
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Related search

Preferences for Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Comparison of Patient and General Population Perspectives

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2014English

Personality, Personal Values and Cooperation Preferences in Public Goods Games: A Longitudinal Study

Personality and Individual Differences
Psychology
2011English

A Comparison of Values of Progress Conveyed in Mathematics Textbook in Malaysia and Australia

International Journal of Asian Social Science
2019English

The Values of Natural and Constructed Wetlands: A Meta-Analysis

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Comparison of Hypertension Management Between Cancer Survivors and the General Public

Hypertension Research
Internal MedicineCardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
2012English

Bioeconomic Modeling of Wetlands and Waterfowl in Western Canada: Accounting for Amenity Values

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics
Planetary ChangeEcologyEconomicsCrop ScienceAnimal ScienceGlobalZoologyAgronomyEconometrics
2011English

Public Awareness of Wetlands and Their Conservation

Acta Geographica Slovenica
PlanningEarthPlanetary SciencesDevelopmentGeography
2008English

An Exploratory Study of Community Expectations Regarding Public Forests in Western Australia

Australian Forestry
Forestry
2012English

Preferences for Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Comparison of the Patient Perspective, the General Population Perspective, and a Population at Risk for Prostate Cancer

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy