A Comparison of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy and External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Ophthalmology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.009
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Ophthalmology
Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Conventional Dacryocystorhinostomy Versus Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy-A Comparative Study

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
OtorhinolaryngologySurgery
2010English

Endonasal Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

2011English

Endonasal Versus External Dacryocystorhinostomy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

2008English

Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy in Wegener Granulomatosis

Archives of Ophthalmology
2010English

Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy With Conventional Instruments: Results and Advantages Over External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
OtorhinolaryngologySurgery
2008English

Mechanical Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy--A Reproducible Technique

Rhinology
MedicineOtorhinolaryngology
2009English

Mechanical Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy With Mucosal Flaps

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Molecular NeuroscienceOphthalmologySensory SystemsCellular
2003English

Clinical Study of Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

Practica Otologica
Otorhinolaryngology
2006English

Comparison of the Results in External Dacryocystorhinostomy With Single Flap and Double Flap Techniques

Gaziantep Medical Journal
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy