Is the Shrink's Role Shrinking? The Ambiguity of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2 Concerning Government Psychiatric Testimony in Negativing Cases

University of Pennsylvania Law Review - United States
doi 10.2307/3312727
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

JSTOR

Related search

Government Consent to Waiver of Jury Trial Under Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Yale Law Journal
Law
1956English

The New Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure: I

Yale Law Journal
Law
1946English

The Role of the Jury System in the French Criminal Procedure

Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu
2015English

Shifting From the Inquisitorial to the Adversarial Model in Criminal Cases: Is a Hearsay Rule Indispensable?

FIU Law Review
2009English

Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases

SSRN Electronic Journal
2012English

The Role of the Federal Government in Eliminating Health Disparities

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
2005English

Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Criminal Procedure

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951)
1942English

Testimony of Parties in Criminal Prosecutions

The American Law Register (1852-1891)
1865English

Criminal Procedure: Negligent Suppression of Evidence as Ground for New Trial in Federal Criminal Proceedings

Duke Law Journal
Law
1962English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy