The Permissible Scope of Hearings, Discovery, and Additional Fact-Finding During Judicial Review of Informal Agency Action

Duke Law Journal - United States
doi 10.2307/1372475
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

JSTOR

Related search

On the Costs and Benefits of Aggressive Judicial Review of Agency Action

Duke Law Journal
Law
1989English

Lessons From SEC v. Citigroup: The Optimal Scope for Judicial Review of Agency Consent Decrees

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

Deciding, ‘What Happened?’ When We Don’t Really Know: Finding Theoretical Grounding for Legitimate Judicial Fact-Finding

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence
Law
2020English

Congress as Manager: Oversight Hearings and Agency Morale

Journal of Public Policy
PolicyManagementMonitoringLawPublic Administration
2015English

Working Smart and Hard? Agency Effort, Judicial Review, and Policy Precision

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

The Tribunals’ Fact-Finding Legacy

2019English

Informal Methods of Judicial Discipline

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1993English

Permissible Scope of Cease and Desist Orders: Legislation and Adjudication by the FTC

University of Chicago Law Review
Law
1962English

Fact-Finding Without Facts

2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy