In Primary Care, Is Measuring Free-Thyroxine Plus Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone to Detect Hypopituitarism Cost-Effective? A Cost Utility Analysis Using Markov Chain Models

BMJ Open - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029369
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

High Sensitivity Assay of Thyroid Stimulating Hormone in Patients Receiving Thyroxine for Primary Hypothyroidism and Thyroid Carcinoma.

BMJ
1985English

Is DOTS-Plus a Feasible and Cost-Effective Strategy?

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2006English

S10 Is It Cost-Effective to Replace Nurses With Lay Asthma Educators in Primary Care?

Thorax
PulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2010English

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone and Thyroxine Screening in the Preterm Newborn: Reference Values

Journal of the Siena Academy of Sciences
2013English

Do Thyroxine and Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Levels Reflect Urinary Iodine Concentrations?

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Pharmacology
2005English

Effective Reduction in Utility Cost in a Beverage Plant

International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology
EngineeringComputer Science ApplicationsEnvironmental Engineering
2019English

A Simple, Cost-Effective Synthesis of Industrially Important Long Chain Primary Alcohols

Open Chemistry Journal
2017English

Shoulder Acute Pain in Primary Health Care: Is Retraining GPs Effective? The SAPPHIRE Randomized Trial: A Cost–effectiveness Analysis

Rheumatology
RheumatologyPharmacology
2009English

Cost-Effective Health Care

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1976English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy