Comparison of kNN and K-Means Optimization Methods of Reference Set Selection for Improved CNV Callers Performance

BMC Bioinformatics - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12859-019-2889-z
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Selection of K in K-Means Clustering

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science
Mechanical Engineering
2005English

A Comparison of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Methods for a Sample of Gulf Cooperation Council Stock Markets

Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia
2014English

Comparison of Two Selection Methods for Sheep

Genetics, Selection, Evolution
EvolutionEcologyGeneticsSystematicsAnimal ScienceMedicineBehaviorZoology
1980English

Apache Mahout's K-Means vs Fuzzy K-Means Performance Evaluation

2016English

Performance Comparison Between Edited kNN and MQ-RBFN for Regression and Classification Tasks

2016English

Comparison of K-Means Clustering Method and K-Medoids on Twitter Data

Indonesian Journal of Statistics and Its Applications
2020English

Comparison of Three Variant Callers for Human Whole Genome Sequencing

Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
2018English

Comparison of Methods for Selection of Castor Beans Lineages

Comunicata Scientiae
AgriculturalBiological Sciences
2019English

Technology of Efficiency Comparison for Alternatives Estimation and Selection Methods

Upravlâûŝie sistemy i mašiny
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy