Can a Static Nonlinearity Account for the Dynamics of Otoacoustic Emission Suppression?

doi 10.1063/1.3658095
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

AIP

Related search

FFT Analysis of Otoacoustic Emissions. The Relationship Between Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emission and Evoked Otoacoustic Emission.

AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
1990English

Growth of Suppression in Humans Based on Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measurements

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2011English

Calibration of Otoacoustic Emission Probe Microphones

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2011English

Properties of a Nonlinear Version of the Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emission

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2010English

Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Suppression Tuning and Acoustic Admittance in Human Infants: Birth Through 6 Months

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2007English

Neonatal Otoacoustic Emission Screening and the Identification of Deafness.

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition
PediatricsGynecologyPerinatologyObstetricsMedicineChild Health
1996English

Otoacoustic Emission Through Waves on Reissner's Membrane

Biophysical Journal
Biophysics
2012English

Attentional Modulation of the Inner Ear: A Combined Otoacoustic Emission and EEG Study

Journal of Neuroscience
Neuroscience
2014English

Clinical Investigation of Individual Differences in Evoked Otoacoustic Emission.

Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan
Otorhinolaryngology
1992English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy