Empirical Methods for Controlling False Positives and Estimating Confidence in ChIP-Seq Peaks

BMC Bioinformatics - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1471-2105-9-523
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Using MACS to Identify Peaks From ChIP-Seq Data

Current Protocols in Bioinformatics
BiochemistryMedicineStructural Biology
2011English

Saturation Analysis of ChIP-seq Data for Reproducible Identification of Binding Peaks

Genome Research
Genetics
2015English

Iterative Fragmentation Improves the Detection of ChIP-seq Peaks for Inactive Histone Marks

Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
BiochemistryComputational MathematicsApplied MathematicsComputer Science ApplicationsMolecular Biology
2016English

False Positives Are Statistically Inevitable

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2016English

SeqAcademy: An Educational Pipeline for RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq Analysis

F1000Research
GeneticsMolecular BiologyPharmacologyBiochemistryMicrobiology ImmunologyMedicineToxicologyPharmaceutics
2018English

Genomic Amplifications Cause False Positives in CRISPR Screens

Cancer Discovery
Oncology
2016English

Table 1: Overlap of siNcor1 or siOct4 Up/Down Regulated Genes With NCOR1 ChIP-seq Peaks.

English

Concavity Analysis for Reduction of Ileocecal Valve False Positives in CTC

2011English

Subgroup Analyses in Randomised Controlled Trials: Quantifying the Risks of False-Positives and False-Negatives

Health Technology Assessment
MedicineHealth Policy
2001English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy