Effects of Nullification Instruction and Testimony Type on Mock Jurors' Decisions.

doi 10.22215/etd/1996-03333
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors
Publisher

Carleton University

Related search

Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Defendant Characteristics and Judgment Behaviors of Adolescent Mock Jurors

Journal of Youth and Adolescence
DevelopmentalEducationSocial SciencesEducational PsychologySocial Psychology
1984English

The Effects of Victim’s Substance Use and Relationship Closeness on Mock Jurors’ Judgments in an Acquaintance Rape Case

Sex Roles
DevelopmentalGender StudiesEducational PsychologySocial Psychology
2006English

Courtroom Preparation of Hypnotic and Nonhypnotic Eyewitnesses; Jurors' Perceptions of Witness Testimony and the Impact of Expert Testimony.

English

Individual Versus Group Decision Making: Jurors’ Reliance on Central and Peripheral Information to Evaluate Expert Testimony

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Jurors' Verdicts in a Mock Rape Trial Experiment; A Social Learning Approach.

English

The Influence Polygraph and Rape Expert Testimony Has on the Verdicts of Jurors in a Simulated Sexual Assault Trail.

English

The Effects of Negligence and Causation Information on Jurors' Determination of Liability

2000English

Murder: Effects of Number of Killers and Victim Mutilation on Simulated Jurors’ Judgments

Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
1975English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy