Peel v Hamon J&C Engineering (Pty) Ltd: Ignoring the Result-Requirement of Section 163(1)(a) of the Companies Act and Extending the Oppression Remedy Beyond Its Statutorily Intended Reach

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal - South Africa
doi 10.4314/pelj.v17i4.14
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Academy of Science of South Africa

Related search

A Report ON THE MILK SUPPLY OF LARGE TOWNS: ITS DEFECTS AND THEIR REMEDY. V. THE MILK COMPANIES OF COPENHAGEN

BMJ
1903English

Dismissal of an Employee at the Instance of a Client: Revisiting Nape v INTCS Corporate Solutions (Pty) LTD in the Context of the Labour Relations Amendment Act 6 of 2014

Law, Democracy & Development
2016English

Minister of Mineral Resources v Mawetse (SA) Mining Corporation (Pty) LTD 2016 (1) SA 306 (SCA)

De Jure
2016English

Extending the Reach of Covalent Drugs

C&EN Global Enterprise
2017English

Prospective Utility: A New Interpretation of the Utility Requirement of Section 101 of the Patent Act

California Law Review
Law
1999English

The Defects of the Insurance Act and Their Remedy

BMJ
1913English

Extending the Technology Acceptance Model Beyond Its Country of Origin

Advanced Topics in Information Resources Management, Volume 1
2002English

Double N Earthmovers Ltd. V. Edmonton (City Of): The Erosion of the Law of Tendering as Set Out in R. V. Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd.

Alberta Law Review
2015English

Marimuthu Munien v BMW Financial Services (SA) (PTY) LTD Unreported Case No 16103/08 (KZD)

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
LawSociologyPolitical Science
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy