G410(P) Should Accidental Administration of Residual Anaesthetic Agents in Intravenous Lines in Children Be Classed a ‘Never Event’?

doi 10.1136/archdischild-2018-rcpch.399
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Related search

Hypertension Guidelines in Children Should Be Universal

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
EpidemiologyCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Mythology and Reality Should Never Be Confused (But Often Are)

BJU International
Urology
2017English

Should Intravenous Thrombolysis Be Considered the First Option in Pregnant Women?

Stroke
CardiologyNeurologyCardiovascular MedicineAdvancedMedicineNeuroscienceSpecialized Nursing
2013English

Never Too Old? Age Should Not Be a Barrier to Enrollment in Cancer Clinical Trials

Oncologist
Cancer ResearchMedicineOncology
2005English

Sports Injuries in Children: Should We Be Concerned?

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
1997English

Should Never-Smokers at Increased Risk for Lung Cancer Be Screened?

Journal of Thoracic Oncology
MedicineOncologyRespiratory MedicinePulmonary
2015English

Syringe for Intravenous Anaesthetic

BMJ
1944English

Should the Window for Intravenous Administration of Tissue Plasminogen Activator in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Be Extended to 4.5 Hours?

Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
PharmacologyPharmacy
2009English

Cost of Anaesthetic Agents

BMJ
1970English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy