In-Vitro Comparison of Antibacterial (Triclosan) Coated Suture Material With Non-Coated Suture Material Against Common Bacterial Pathogens Causing Surgical Site Infection

International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
doi 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.356
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Excellent Publishers

Related search

Intraoperative Handling and Wound Healing: Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Coated VICRYL® Plus Antibacterial Suture (Coated Polyglactin 910 Suture With Triclosan) With Coated VICRYL® Suture (Coated Polyglactin 910 Suture)

Surgical Infections
SurgeryInfectious DiseasesMicrobiology
2005English

Jejunal Carcinoma Associated With Non-Absorbable Suture Material.

Postgraduate Medical Journal
Medicine
1988English

Hysteroscopic Removal of Unabsorbed Suture Material Causing “Unexplained” Menstrual Disorder

Gynecological Surgery
GynecologySurgeryObstetrics
2010English

Migrating Surgical Suture Material in the Duodenum After Cholecystectomy

Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
1994English

Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Triclosan-Coated Sutures for the Prevention of Surgical-Site Infection

British Journal of Surgery
Surgery
2017English

A Comparative Study to Test the Effectiveness of Triclosan Coated Polyglactin 910 in Reduction of Surgical Site Infection in Clean Wounds

International Surgery Journal
2019English

A Biomechanical Comparison of Tendon Repair With a Knotless Barbed Suture and a Conventional Monofilament Suture Material: An Ex-Vivo Animal Experiment

Journal of Academic Research in Medicine
2020English

A Comparison of Sutureless and Antibacterial Suture Abdomen Closure

Bratislava Medical Journal
2013English

Early Skin Reaction of Polydioxanone Suture Material Following Septorhinoplasty

American Journal of Case Reports
Medicine
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy