Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: Outcome From T. Cancriformis Diapausing Egg DNA Barcoding.

doi 10.7717/peerj.3228/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 3: Proportion of T. Cancriformis Viable Eggs Per Site From the Three Methods Employed (Sediment Hatching, Isolation Hatching and DNA Barcoding Each From a 20 G Subsample).

English

Figure 2: Statistical Parsimony Network of COI Sequences From T. Cancriformis Isolates With T. Mauritanicus as an Outgroup.

English

DNA Barcoding of Spiders From Agricultural Fields

Mitochondrial DNA Part B: Resources
GeneticsMolecular Biology
2019English

DNA Barcoding of Metazoan Zooplankton Copepods From South Korea

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls

PLoS Biology
ImmunologyMolecular BiologyGeneticsBiochemistryMicrobiology Biological SciencesAgriculturalNeuroscience
2004English

Table 2: Reaction System 2 of T-Aoc.

English

DNA Barcoding Assessment of Genetic Variation in Two Widespread Skinks From Madagascar, Trachylepis Elegans and T. Gravenhorstii (Squamata: Scincidae)

Zootaxa
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnimal ScienceBehaviorZoology
2014English

Trends in DNA Barcoding and Metabarcoding

Genome
MedicineBiotechnologyGeneticsMolecular Biology
2019English

Genetic Diversity and DNA Barcoding of Yam Accessions From Southern Nigeria

American Journal of Plant Sciences
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy