Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 1: Examples of Unprofessional Peer Reviews From Survey Respondents.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8247/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Unprofessional Peer Reviews Disproportionately Harm Underrepresented Groups in STEM

PeerJ
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesMedicineAgriculturalNeuroscience
2019English

Figure 1: Summary of Respondents’ TB Screening Results.

English

Figure 1: Representative Examples of CD8+ TILs Immunostaining.

English

Non-Respondents in a Psychiatric Survey.

American Journal of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
1976English

Table 2: Demographic Characteristics of Survey Respondents.

English

High Satisfaction: Thank You Survey Respondents!

Permanente journal,The
Medicine
2009English

Publishing a Peer-Reviewed Journal Without Peer Reviews

Journal of Food Science
Food Science
2017English

Table 1: Respondents Characteristics.

English

Unprofessional Behaviour

BMJ
1992English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy