Hybrid Versus Traditional Cardiac Rehabilitation Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kardiologia Polska - Poland
doi 10.5603/kp.a2018.0175
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne

Related search

High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Within Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
2018English

Steroids in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

British Journal of Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Is Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Effective? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Re-Examine the Evidence

BMJ Open
Medicine
2018English

Community-Based Management Versus Traditional Hospitalization in Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Global Health Research and Policy
2016English

High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin After Cardiac Stress Test: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Journal of the American Heart Association
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2019English

Tranexamic Acid in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Protocol)

BMJ Open
Medicine
2019English

Proportional Modes Versus Pressure Support Ventilation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Annals of Intensive Care
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2018English

Terlipressin Versus Norepinephrine for Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Pharmacology
Pharmacology
2019English

Rehabilitation Effects in Patients With Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Minerva Ortopedica e Traumatologica
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy