Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: An Update Meta-Analysis

BMC Urology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12894-017-0295-2
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Tubeless Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy at Duhok Province, Kurdistan, Iraq

Duhok Medical Journal
2018English

Comparison of Standard and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Renal Calculi: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial

International Journal of Clinical Trials
2019English

Re: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal of Urological Surgery
2016English

Supracostal Access: Does It Affect Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Efficacy and Safety?

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
MedicineUrology
2010English

Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Pcnl) in Renal Allografts: A Case Report and Mini-Review

Italian Journal of Medicine
Medicine
2016English

Comparsion Between Tubeless and Standard Nephrolithotomy of Renal Resistive Index in Kidneys of Patients

Journal of Academic Research in Medicine
2013English

Our Experience of Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Kidney Stones

Erciyes Tip Dergisi
Medicine
2013English

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

BMJ
1981English

Comparison of Conventional Nephrolithotomy With Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Japanese Journal of Urology
Urology
1987English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy