Thresholds for the Frequency Discrimination of Pulsed Tones (DLFs) and for the Detection of Frequency Modulation (FMDLs): Effects of Noise and Random Variations in Level

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America - United States
doi 10.1121/1.2026694
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Acoustical Society of America (ASA)

Related search

Effects of Carrier Frequency, Modulation Rate, and Modulation Waveform on the Detection of Modulation and the Discrimination of Modulation Type (Amplitude Modulation Versus Frequency Modulation)

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1995English

Frequency Discrimination of Pure and Complex Tones

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1964English

Experimental Study on Hearing Thresholds for Low-Frequency Pure Tones

Acoustical Science and Technology
AcousticsUltrasonics
2014English

Level and Age Effects in Infant Frequency Discrimination

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1987English

Frequency Discrimination in Noise

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1969English

Frequency Discrimination in Noise

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1966English

Intensity Discrimination and Loudness for Tones in Notched Noise

Perception & Psychophysics
1987English

Attentional Filters and Frequency Uncertainty in the Detection of One or More Tones

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1988English

Reduction of Frequency Noise and Frequency Shift by Phase Shifting Elements in Frequency Modulation Atomic Force Microscopy

Review of Scientific Instruments
MedicineInstrumentation
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy