Figure 12: Comparison of the Auditory Regions of (A, C) the Presumed Tranatocetid ‘Cetotherium’ Megalophysum (USNM 10593, Holotype) and (B, D) the Cetotheriid Piscobalaena Nana (MNHN SAS 1616).

doi 10.7717/peerj.6426/fig-12

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 1: Nana Positioning Protocol (A, C) and NHANES Positioning Protocol (B, D).

English

Figure 12: USNM 299821, Holotype Specimen of Eozygodactylus Americanus (Scale Bar Equals 1 Cm).

English

Figure 3: Male Holotype of H. Triedrus MNHN 2297.

English

Figure 6: The KEGG Signaling Analysis of Genes in the Profiles 0 (A), 1 (B), 12 (C), and 23 (D).

English

Figure 12: Light Microscopy Micrographs at Different Magnifications of the Esophagus (A–C), Cardiac, Fundic and Pyloric Gland Regions of the Stomach (D–F).

English

Figure 11: Mastigodiaptomus Cihuatlan Sp. N., Adult Female, Holotype (A and C) and Adult Male, Allotype (B and D–F).

English

Figure 3: Mastigodiaptomus Alexei Sp. N., Adult Female, Holotype (A, C and D) and Adult Male, Allotype (B, E and F).

English

Figure 10: Damage to the Mandible and Auditory Region of Tranatocetus Argillarius (GMUC VP2319, Holotype).

English

Figure 1: Analysis of DEmRNAs (A, C) and DEcircRNAs (B, D).

English