Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 12: Comparison of the Auditory Regions of (A, C) the Presumed Tranatocetid ‘Cetotherium’ Megalophysum (USNM 10593, Holotype) and (B, D) the Cetotheriid Piscobalaena Nana (MNHN SAS 1616).
doi 10.7717/peerj.6426/fig-12
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Nana Positioning Protocol (A, C) and NHANES Positioning Protocol (B, D).
Figure 12: USNM 299821, Holotype Specimen of Eozygodactylus Americanus (Scale Bar Equals 1 Cm).
Figure 3: Male Holotype of H. Triedrus MNHN 2297.
Figure 6: The KEGG Signaling Analysis of Genes in the Profiles 0 (A), 1 (B), 12 (C), and 23 (D).
Figure 12: Light Microscopy Micrographs at Different Magnifications of the Esophagus (A–C), Cardiac, Fundic and Pyloric Gland Regions of the Stomach (D–F).
Figure 11: Mastigodiaptomus Cihuatlan Sp. N., Adult Female, Holotype (A and C) and Adult Male, Allotype (B and D–F).
Figure 10: Damage to the Mandible and Auditory Region of Tranatocetus Argillarius (GMUC VP2319, Holotype).
Figure 3: Mastigodiaptomus Alexei Sp. N., Adult Female, Holotype (A, C and D) and Adult Male, Allotype (B, E and F).
Figure 1: Analysis of DEmRNAs (A, C) and DEcircRNAs (B, D).
