The Uneasy Case for the Priority of Secured Claims in Bankruptcy: Further Thoughts and a Reply to Critics

doi 10.3386/w6472
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

National Bureau of Economic Research

Related search

The Easy Case for the Priority of Secured Claims in Bankruptcy

Duke Law Journal
Law
1997English

A Reply to the Critics

Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya, sotsiologiya, politologiya
2019English

A Reply to Critics

Filosofskii Zhurnal
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2018English

Reply to Critics

Good Society
PhilosophySociologyPolitical Science
2005English

For an “Ambitious History”: A Reply to Our Critics

Annales (English ed.)
2015English

Restriction on the Rights of Secured Creditors in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Hang Tuah Law Journal
2017English

Reply to the Critics on “Binge Drinking and Alcohol Prices”

Health Economics Review
Health Policy
2016English

The Uneasy Case for Progressive Taxation.

Journal of Finance
AccountingEconomicsEconometricsFinance
1954English

The Uneasy Case for Capital Taxation

Social Philosophy and Policy
PhilosophySocial Sciences
2006English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy