No Evidence Favouring One Irrigant Versus Another in Root Canal Treatments

Evidence-Based Dentistry - United Kingdom
doi 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400891
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Dentistry
Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chitosan as Root Canal Irrigant on Enterococcus Faecalis

Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls
2019English

The Antibacterial Effect of Myrtus Communis as Root Canal Irrigant: A Comparative Study

Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
2009English

Formulation and Characterization of Chlorhexidine HCl Nanoemulsion as a Promising Antibacterial Root Canal Irrigant: In-Vitro and Ex-Vivo Studies

International Journal of Nanomedicine
Organic ChemistryBiophysicsBiomaterialsPharmaceutical ScienceMedicineBioengineeringDrug DiscoveryNanoscienceNanotechnology
2019English

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Root Canal Treatments Performed by Dental Students

RSBO
2016English

Can 'Favouring' One Leg Damage the Other?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
1994English

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Green Tea Extract Irrigant Versus Physiological Saline Following Root Canal Treatment of Infected Primary Molars in a Group of Egyptian Children : A Randomized Clinical Trial

Egyptian Dental Journal
2017English

Effect of Sonic Versus Ultrasonic Activation on Aqueous Solution Penetration in Root Canal Dentin.

Journal of Oral Research
Dentistry
2018English

Semiconductor Laser Irradiation Improves Root Canal Sealing During Routine Root Canal Therapy

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Insufficient Evidence for the Effectiveness of Ultrasonic Instrumentation for Root Canal Treatment

Evidence-Based Dentistry
Dentistry
2008English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy