Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 7: Evaluation of MetaCRAST, Crass, and MinCED Run Times on Simulated AMD (A and B) and EBPR (C and D) Metagenomes.

doi 10.7717/peerj.3788/fig-7
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 1: Analysis of DEmRNAs (A, C) and DEcircRNAs (B, D).

English

Figure 4: Assembly Accuracy Comparison Between Two Alternative Strategies on CAMI2 Simulated Dataset (A and B) and the MetaHIT Human Microbiome Dataset (C and D).

English

Figure 4: Mean (±SE) Times Spent by the Racer Goby (A, B) and Western Tubenose Goby (C, D) on Sandy and Mussel Substrata (A, C) as Well as on Stone and Mussel Substrata (B, D) in Experiment 2 (Substratum Choice Experiment).

English

MetaCRAST: Reference-Guided Extraction of CRISPR Spacers From Unassembled Metagenomes

2017English

MetaCRAST: Reference-Guided Extraction of CRISPR Spacers From Unassembled Metagenomes

2017English

Figure 4: PCA Scores and Loadings Plots of NAIs Against Influenza a (A and B, Respectively) and B (C and D, Respectively).

English

Figure 3: Chlorophyll a (A), B (B), A+b (C) and a/B (D) in Leaves of Three Forages Under Shading.

English

Figure 1: Nana Positioning Protocol (A, C) and NHANES Positioning Protocol (B, D).

English

Isolation of Pentopyranines A, B, C and D

Agricultural and Biological Chemistry
1973English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy