In Relation to Science and Social Nonscience: A Critique of Pearson and Fisher

Social Thought and Research
doi 10.17161/str.1808.4877
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

The University of Kansas

Related search

Pearson-Fisher Chi-Square Statistic Revisited

Information (Switzerland)
Information Systems
2011English

Models and Statistical Inference: The Controversy Between Fisher and Neyman-Pearson

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2006English

Relation of Air Pollution to Mortality: A Critique

1976English

Maximal Disks and the Tully‐Fisher Relation

Astrophysical Journal
AstrophysicsAstronomyPlanetary ScienceSpace
1999English

The Tully-Fisher Relation and Its Application to the Distance Scale

Highlights of Astronomy
1983English

Correction To: Theoricity, Observation and Homology: A Response to Pearson

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
ArtsHumanitiesPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2018English

Retrospectives Irving Fisher'sAppreciation and Interest(1896) and the Fisher Relation

Journal of Economic Perspectives
EconomicsEconometrics
2012English

Social Epigenetics: A Science of Social Science?

Sociological Review
SociologyPolitical Science
2016English

A Materialist and Standpoint Critique of Social Movements’ Theoretical Presumptions

Theory in Action
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy