Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Limiting the Use of Acquitted and Uncharged Conduct at Sentencing: Apprendi v. New Jersey and Its Effect on the Relevant Conduct Provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

California Law Review - United States
doi 10.2307/3481294
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date

July 1, 2001

Authors
Freya Russell
Publisher

JSTOR


Related search

Sentencing Equality for Deportable Aliens: Departures From the Sentencing Guidelines on the Basis of Alienage

Michigan Law Review
Law
2000English

A Simplified Sentencing Grid: Model Sentencing Guidelines S1.1

Federal Sentencing Reporter
2006English

Do Sentencing Guidelines Raise the Cost of Punishment?

1998English

Plea Bargaining: Its Effect on Sentencing and Convictions in the District of Columbia

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1979English

A Partial Fix of a Broken Guideline: A Proposed Amendment to Section 2G2.2 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines

SSRN Electronic Journal
2019English

The Effects of Defendant and Juror Language Use on Sentencing Recommendations

2013English

Salvaging the Sentencing Guidelines in Seven Easy Steps

Federal Sentencing Reporter
1997English

Salvaging the Sentencing Guidelines in Seven Easy Steps

Federal Sentencing Reporter
1992English

Federal Sentencing Guidelines. The Requirement of Notice for Upward Departure

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1992English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy