Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI

In Vivo - Greece
doi 10.21873/invivo.11050
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

International Institute of Anticancer Research

Related search

Comparison of Mild Ovarian Stimulation With Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders

Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine
Reproductive Medicine
2011English

Mild Stimulation Versus Conventional IVF: A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2016English

Ovarian Stimulation Modalities in Poor Responders

Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Medicine
2019English

T53: Multi-Center Research of a Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment for Poor Ovarian Response Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET

American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
GynecologyReproductive MedicineImmunologyObstetricsAllergy
2018English

Aromatase Inhibitors in “Poor” Ovarian Responders Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization

Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases
2017English

Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation Following Oocyte Retrieval: Is It Helpful for Poor Responders?

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
GynecologyEndocrinologyReproductive MedicineDevelopmental BiologyObstetrics
2015English

Low Ovarian Stimulation Using Tamoxifen/FSH Compared to Conventional IVF: A Cohort Comparative Study in Conventional IVF Treatments

Reproductive System & Sexual Disorders
2015English

Mild Ovarian Stimulation Has Similar Live Birth Rates as Compared With Hyper Stimulation for Treatment of Poor Responding IVF Patients of Advanced Maternal Age

Journal of Fertility Biomarkers
2017English

Serum GDF-8 Levels Change Dynamically During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in Patients Undergoing IVF/ICSI-ET

Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy