Evaluation of Dialysis Centres: Values and Criteria of the Stakeholders

BMC Health Services Research- United Kingdom

doi 10.1186/s12913-020-05085-w

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Categories

Health Policy

Date

Authors

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making to Highlight Stakeholders’ Values in the Corridor Planning Process

Journal of Transport and Land Use
DevelopmentUrban StudiesPlanningTransportationGeography
2011English

Explaining the Variations in the Pedestrian Flow Values of Shopping Centres

English

Considering the Values Stakeholders Wish to Sustain in Decision Making

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
DevelopmentMedicinePlanningEnvironmental ScienceGeography
2018English

Perceived Importance of District Developed Teacher Evaluation Standards and Criteria as Measured by Teacher Values Survey

English

Clinical Evaluation of Bicarbonate Dialysis

Journal of Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy
1981English

Conflicting Values in Rural Planning: A Multifunctionality Approach Through Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation

Sustainability
DevelopmentManagementMonitoringEnvironmental ScienceRenewable EnergyEnergy EngineeringLawSustainabilityPlanningPolicyPower Technologythe EnvironmentGeography
2018English

Q Methodology for Assessing Urban Park Values Among Stakeholders

2016English

Development and Evaluation of a Retroperitoneal Dialysis Porcine Model

Clinical Nephrology
MedicineNephrology
2016English

Puk21 - Cost Utility Analysis of End Stage Renal Disease Treatment in Ministry of Health Dialysis Centres, Malaysia: Haemodialysis Versus Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy