Is There an Age When Myocardial Perfusion Imaging May No Longer Be Prognostically Useful?

Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging - United States
doi 10.1161/circimaging.117.007322
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

When ‘Smaller Is Stronger’ No Longer Holds

Materials Research Letters
Materials Science
2018English

Regadenoson for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Is It Safe?

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyCardiovascular MedicineImagingCardiology
2014English

Myocardial Perfusion Imaging With PET

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyCardiovascular MedicineImagingCardiology
2017English

Acute Appendicitis May No Longer Be a Predominant Disease of the Young Population

Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy
MedicineCritical CareAnesthesiologyPain MedicineIntensive Care Medicine
2019English

Enough Is Enough! When Identification No Longer Prevents Negative Corporate Associations

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
MarketingEconomicsInternational ManagementBusinessEconometrics
2006English

Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Abnormality on SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Is More Reproducible Than Expert Visual Analysis

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyCardiovascular MedicineImagingCardiology
2009English

The NHS Is No Longer an Attractive Option

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Medicine
2016English

When (Se) Voir Can No Longer See

Journal for Foreign Languages
2015English

Patient Satisfaction With Coronary CT Angiography, Myocardial CT Perfusion, Myocardial Perfusion MRI, SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Conventional Coronary Angiography

European Radiology
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyImaging
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy