Cost-Effectiveness of Annual Versus Biennial Screening Mammography for Women With High Mammographic Breast Density

Journal of Medical Screening - United Kingdom
doi 10.1177/0969141314549758
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related search

Cost-Effectiveness of MRI Compared to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening in a High Risk Population

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2009English

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Annual Breast Cancer Screening in Japan.

Nihon Nyugan Kenshin Gakkaishi (Journal of Japan Association of Breast Cancer Screening)
1997English

Reply to Opportunity Cost of Annual Screening Mammography

Cancer
Cancer ResearchOncology
2017English

Breast Cancer Screening; Mammography Versus Dynamic Mri Breast

THE PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2017English

Effectiveness of Screening With Annual Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Mammography: Results of the Initial Screen From the Ontario High Risk Breast Screening Program

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cancer ResearchMedicineOncology
2014English

Detection of Breast Cancer With Addition of Annual Screening Ultrasound or a Single Screening MRI to Mammography in Women With Elevated Breast Cancer Risk

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
2012English

Should Breast Cancer Screening Programs Routinely Measure Mammographic Density?

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
OncologyRadiologyNuclear MedicineImaging
2018English

Using Mammographic Density to Improve Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
MedicineEpidemiologyOncology
2008English

High Mammographic Density in Women Is Associated With Protumor Inflammation

Breast Cancer Research
Cancer ResearchOncology
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy