Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: 5th Annual Update to a Systematic Review of Core Outcome Sets for Research

PLoS ONE - United States
doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0225980
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Related search

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: 4th Annual Update to a Systematic Review of Core Outcome Sets for Research

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2018English

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2014English

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Core Outcome Sets: A Barrier-Free Tool for Research?

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

The Need for Consensus, Consistency, and Core Outcome Sets in Perioperative Research

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2015English

Social Network Analysis Identified Central Outcomes for Core Outcome Sets Using Systematic Reviews of HIV/AIDS

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2016English

Towards a Core Outcome Set for Hemorrhoidal Disease—a Systematic Review of Outcomes Reported in Literature

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Gastroenterology
2018English

Choosing Outcomes in Pregnancy Research

Obstetric Medicine
GynecologyObstetrics
2011English

Methods to Identify and Prioritize Patient-Centered Outcomes for Use in Comparative Effectiveness Research

Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Medicine
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy