Legal Report: UR Here: The Supreme Court's Guide for Managed Care

Health Affairs - United States
doi 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.219
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Health Affairs (Project Hope)

Related search

Anticompetitive Patent Settlements and the Supreme Court's Actavis Decision

SSRN Electronic Journal
2013English

The First Congress Canon and the Supreme Court's Use of History

California Law Review
Law
2006English

A Capital Waste of Time? Examining the Supreme Court's 'Culture of Death'

SSRN Electronic Journal
2008English

Sixth Amendment: The Evolution of the Supreme Court's Retroactivity Doctrine: A Futile Search for Theoretical Clarity

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
Law
1990English

Secular Idolatry and Sacred Traditions: A Critique of the Supreme Court's Secularization Analysis

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1998English

Managed Care = Managed Cost = Managed Chaos?

Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Psychiatric Mental Health
1996English

Fear and Loathing in Colorado: Invoking the Supreme Court's State-Controversy Jurisdiction to Challenge the Marijuana-Legalization Experiment

SSRN Electronic Journal
2014English

In Defense of Disparate Impact: Urban Redevelopment and the Supreme Court's Recent Interest in the Fair Housing Act

SSRN Electronic Journal
2014English

Medicaid Managed Care for Elderly, Disabled Populations

Health Affairs
MedicineHealth Policy
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy