Though Forced, Still Valid: Psychometric Equivalence of Forced-Choice and Single-Statement Measures

Organizational Research Methods - United States
doi 10.1177/1094428119836486
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

SAGE Publications

Related search

Serial Position Effects in 2-Alternative Forced Choice Recognition: Functional Equivalence Across Visual and Auditory Modalities

Memory
ArtsPsychologyHumanities
2009English

Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2019English

Accurate Forced-Choice Recognition Without Awareness of Memory Retrieval

Learning and Memory
Molecular NeurosciencePhysiological PsychologyNeuropsychologyCellularCognitive Neuroscience
2008English

Yes/No Recognition, Forced-Choice Recognition, and the Human Hippocampus

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
2008English

A Two-Interval Forced-Choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Journal of Visualized Experiments
ImmunologyMolecular BiologyBiochemistryMicrobiology Chemical EngineeringNeuroscienceGenetics
2018English

Performance Differences Among the Intervals in Forced-Choice Tasks

Perception & Psychophysics
1984English

The Impact of Aberrant Responses and Detection in Forced-Choice Noncognitive Assessment

ETS Research Report Series
StatisticsProbabilityUncertaintyApplied PsychologySocial PsychologyEducation
2018English

A Sliding Two-Alternative Forced-Choice Paradigm for Pitch Discrimination

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
2017English

A Characteristic Function Equation for Two‐interval Forced‐choice Experiments

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
AcousticsUltrasonicsArtsHumanities
1980English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy