Differences in Nutrient Foraging Among Trifolium Subterraneum Cultivars Deliver Improved P-Acquisition Efficiency

Plant and Soil - Netherlands
doi 10.1007/s11104-017-3511-7
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Topsoil Foraging and Phosphorus Acquisition Efficiency in Maize (Zea Mays)

Functional Plant Biology
Plant ScienceAgronomyCrop Science
2005English

Dry Matter Accumulation, Nutrient Uptake and Nutrient Use Efficiency of Two Improved Cultivars of Taro (Colocasia Esculenta) Under Screen House Conditions in Samoa

Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International
2017English

Nitrogenase Activity in Trifolium Subterraneum L. In Relation to the Uptake of Nitrate Ions

Plant Physiology
Plant ScienceGeneticsPhysiology
1987English

Differences in Efficiency Among Kansas Beef Cow Producers

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
1998English

Endoreduplication as a Part of Flower Ontogeny in Trifolium Pratense Cultivars

Botanical Studies
2016English

The Interaction of Light and Temperature in Determining the Growth Rate of Subterranean Clover (Trifolium Subterraneum L.)

Australian Journal of Biological Sciences
1955English

Comparative Effects of Grazing, Herbicide or Forage Conservation on Barley Grass Content in Trifolium Subterraneum L. Clover-Based Pasture

Crop and Pasture Science
Plant ScienceAgronomyCrop Science
2019English

Dry Weight Production and Nitrogen Efficiency Traits in Kentucky Bluegrass Cultivars in Nutrient Solution and Soil

Crop Science
AgronomyCrop Science
1997English

Explaining Differences in Efficiency Among Farrow-To-Finish Producers

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports
1996English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy