Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Confounding, Effect Modification, and the Odds Ratio: Common Misinterpretations

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Netherlands
doi 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.012
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Epidemiology
Date

April 1, 2015

Authors
Ian ShrierMenglan Pang
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Odds Ratio

2018English

Double-Robust Estimation of an Exposure-Outcome Odds Ratio Adjusting for Confounding in Cohort and Case-Control Studies

Statistics in Medicine
EpidemiologyStatisticsProbability
2010English

Confounding Obscures Our View, Effect Modification Is Part of Reality

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Epidemiology
2019English

The Odds Ratio: A Useful Tool in Neurosciences.

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
PsychiatryMental HealthNeurologySurgery
1989English

The Size of Actinoid(III) Ions – Structural Analysis vs. Common Misinterpretations

Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Inorganic ChemistryMaterials ChemistryTheoretical ChemistryPhysical
2016English

The Fallacy of Ratio Correction to Address Confounding Factors

Laboratory Animals
Animal ScienceZoologyVeterinary
2012English

The Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio and Log Odds Ratio in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OTO Open
2018English

A Note on Some Recent Misinterpretations of the Cantillon Effect

Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2020English

The Shortest Width Confidence Interval for Odds Ratio in Logistic Regression

Open Journal of Statistics
2012English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy