Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

The Argument for a Narrow Conception of ‘Religious Autonomy’

Oxford Journal of Law and Religion - United Kingdom
doi 10.1093/ojlr/rwv009
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Religious StudiesLaw
Date

April 24, 2015

Authors
Lisbet Christoffersen
Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)


Related search

The Equal Weight Argument Against Religious Exclusivism

2012English

The Autonomy of the Contracting Partners: An Argument for Heuristic Contractarian Business Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics
ArtsManagementBusinessHumanitiesEconomicsInternational ManagementAccountingLawEconometrics
2006English

The Religious Conception of Man in Shin Buddhism

JOURNAL OF INDIAN AND BUDDHIST STUDIES (INDOGAKU BUKKYOGAKU KENKYU)
1959English

Morality Without Religion: Argument From the Autonomy of Reason Crispin

International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
2019English

Respecting Autonomy in Population Policy: An Argument for International Family Planning Programs

Public Health Ethics
Health PolicyEthicsIssuesLegal Aspects
2010English

Perceptions of Undue Influence Shed Light on the Folk Conception of Autonomy

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2018English

The Claim to Autonomy of the Human Sciences: A Critique of Wilhelm Dilthey's Hermeneutic Conception

2005English

A Rough and Narrow Path: Preserving Native American Religious Liberty in the Smith Era

American Indian Law Review
2000English

For the Sake of Argument

Forestry Chronicle
Forestry
1962English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy