Attitudes of Editors of Core Clinical Journals About Whether Systematic Reviews Are Original Research: A Mixed-Methods Study

BMJ Open - United Kingdom
doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029704
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Medicine
Date
Authors
Publisher

BMJ

Related search

Pharmacists’ Knowledge and Attitudes About Natural Health Products: A Mixed-Methods Study

Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Health PolicyPharmacology
2014English

Reviews About: Gender, Mobility and Research Methods

Central and Eastern European Review
2016English

How Do Authors of Systematic Reviews Deal With Research Malpractice and Misconduct in Original Studies? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Survey of Their Authors

BMJ Open
Medicine
2016English

Assessment of Whether Published Non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Nursing Follow the Review Protocols Registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): A Comparative Study

2020English

Publications on Clinical Research in Otolaryngology–A Systematic Analysis of Leading Journals in 2010

Frontiers in Surgery
Surgery
2019English

Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2012English

A Survey of Prevalence of Narrative and Systematic Reviews in Five Major Medical Journals

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2017English

Systematic Reviews and Research Waste

The Lancet
Medicine
2016English

Mixed Methods Research

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)
Medicine
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy