Determining Modes of Liability in International Criminal Law: Why the Common Purpose Doctrine Is the Strongest Legal Response to Mass Atrocity Crimes

doi 10.1163/9789004345911_006
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Brill | Nijhoff

Related search

Creation of the International Criminal Court and Legal Issues of Responsibility for International Crimes

Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law
2017English

Criminal Liability for the Creation of a Hazard: A State of Study of the Problem in the Doctrine of Criminal Law

Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law
2019English

Defying Gravity: The Development of Standards in the International Prosecution of International Atrocity Crimes

Indiana International & Comparative Law Review
2013English

The Institute of Discharge From Criminal Liability in Criminal Law

Herald of the Association of Criminal Law of Ukraine
2018English

Crimes Against Humanity: A Category Hors Concours in International Criminal Law?

SSRN Electronic Journal
2012English

Atrocity Crimes Framing the Responsibility to Protect

2009English

Why Is the U.S. Afraid of the International Criminal Court

2008English

Foreign Experience in Applying Criminal Liability to Legal Entities

Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law
2019English

The Israeli International Legal Liability Resulted From Gaza Strip Blockade in the Light of International Law Rules

2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy