Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Assessing Providers of Coronary Revascularization: A Method for Peer Review Organizations.
American Journal of Public Health
- United States
doi 10.2105/ajph.82.12.1631
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Categories
Environmental
Public Health
Occupational Health
Date
December 1, 1992
Authors
A J Hartz
E M Kuhn
K L Kayser
D P Pryor
R Green
A A Rimm
Publisher
American Public Health Association
Related search
A Method for Peer Review, a Peer Review for Methods
Nature Methods
Biochemistry
Biotechnology
Cell Biology
Molecular Biology
Federal Efforts to Improve Peer Review Organizations
Health Affairs
Medicine
Health Policy
Respite for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization
Vessel Plus
New Technology for Surgical Coronary Revascularization
Circulation
Cardiovascular Medicine
Physiology
Cardiology
Coronary Artery Revascularization for Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Journal of the Japanese Coronary Association
Minimally Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
Heart Surgery Forum
Surgery
Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiology
Incomplete Coronary Revascularization: A Cautionary Tale
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Pulmonary
Respiratory Medicine
Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review
Cell
Biochemistry
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Emergency Coronary Revascularization for Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
