Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: Comparisons of Performance of the Three Different Regression Methods.
doi 10.7717/peerj.4817/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 3: Comparisons of Effects on the Molecular Identification of Single Dioncysts by Different Cleaning Methods.
Comparisons of Three Different Methods for Defining Sarcopenia: An Aspect of Cardiometabolic Risk
Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
Table 3: Clustering Performance vs Different Parameters.
Table 4: The Performance of the Six Methods on Different Magnitude of Between-Study Heterogeneity Under the Rule of Three.
Table 1: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the CROSS Dataset.
Table 2: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the Lankershim Dataset.
Table 3: The Linear Regression Statistics.
Table 3: Comparison of the Accuracy of the Calibration Results (N= 152) Achieved by NIRS Using Three Different Methods for Evaluation.
Table 5: The Performance of the Six Methods on Different Number of Studies Included in a Meta-Analysis Under the Rule of Three.
