Response to Comments by Beekhuizen Et Al. On “Exposure Assessment of Mobile Phone Base Station Radiation in an Outdoor Environment Using Sequential Surrogate Modeling”

Bioelectromagnetics - United States
doi 10.1002/bem.21803
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Response to Comments by Emma Et Al.

American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
PulmonaryRespiratory MedicinePhysiologyCell Biology
2016English

Response to Comments by Timpson Et Al. And Yu Et Al.

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2007English

Use of Portable Exposure Meters for Comparing Mobile Phone Base Station Radiation in Different Types of Areas in the Cities of Basel and Amsterdam

Science of the Total Environment
DisposalEnvironmental ChemistryWaste ManagementEnvironmental EngineeringPollution
2014English

Histological and Biochemical Studies of Mice Kidney After Exposure to Mobile Phone Radiation

Journal of Basic Research in Medical Sciences
2016English

Comments on Paper by Kitanovski Et Al.

2019English

Cell Phone Radiation and Genomic Damage: In Vitro Exposure and Assessment

International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology
2015English

Assessment Long Term Effect of Mobile Phone Usage on Hearing Faculties Using Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry

Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology
2016English

Reply to the Comments by Eibach Et Al.

Child's Nervous System
MedicineChild HealthNeurologyPediatricsPerinatology
2020English

Comments to the Manuscript by Xuan Et Al.

2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy