A Survey of Prevalence of Narrative and Systematic Reviews in Five Major Medical Journals

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12874-017-0453-y
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Reporting Quality of Abstracts of Trials Published in Top Five Pain Journals: A Protocol for a Systematic Survey

BMJ Open
Medicine
2016English

Systematic Reviews Provide Information Not Contained in Traditional Narrative Reviews

BMJ
1997English

Under-Representation of Developing Countries in the Research Literature: Ethical Issues Arising From a Survey of Five Leading Medical Journals

BMC Medical Ethics
Health PolicyEthicsHealthIssuesLegal Aspects
2004English

A Systematic Review of Clinical Trial Registration in Major Respiratory Journals 2010–2018

European Respiratory Journal
MedicinePulmonaryRespiratory Medicine
2018English

Pss1 - Systematic Reviews of Ophthalmic Adverse Drug Reactions Published in Ophthalmology Journals: A Methodological Assessment

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

Prevalence of Medical Errors in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2019English

Endorsement of PRISMA Statement and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in Nursing Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study

BMJ Open
Medicine
2017English

Epidemiology, Quality and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Traditional Chinese Medicine Interventions Published in Chinese Journals

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2011English

How Do Authors of Systematic Reviews Deal With Research Malpractice and Misconduct in Original Studies? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Systematic Reviews and Survey of Their Authors

BMJ Open
Medicine
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy