Should Physicians Instead of Industry Representatives Be the Main Actor of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Follow-Up? (Super Follow-Up)

Anatolian journal of cardiology - Turkey
doi 10.14744/anatoljcardiol.2017.7374
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Kare Publishing

Related search

Remote Monitoring and Follow-Up of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in the Netherlands

Netherlands Heart Journal
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2012English

Follow-Up in Community Pharmacy Should Be Routine, Not Extraordinary

Canadian Pharmacists Journal
Pharmaceutical SciencePharmacy
2018English

Efficacy and Safety of Automatic Remote Monitoring for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Follow-Up: The Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up (TRUST) Trial

Circulation
Cardiovascular MedicinePhysiologyCardiology
2010English

Nothing Hurts Follow-Up Like Follow-Up?

Global Spine Journal
OrthopedicsSurgeryNeurologySports Medicine
2015English

Should Follow-Up of Patients With Arthroplasties Be Carried Out by General Practitioners?

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
2007English

Use of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators After Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Prospective Follow-Up Study

CMAJ
Medicine
2004English

Follow-Up of Cardiac Fabry Disease Treated by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

CASE
2017English

Follow-Up of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Quality of Life and Attitudes Towards Follow-Up

British Journal of Cancer
Cancer ResearchOncology
1997English

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection

Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy