Table 7: Correlation and Effect Size Metrics Measuring the Agreement Between the SDNN, lnSDNN, RMSSD, and pNN50 Values Derived From rPPG Recordings of Different Lengths and the Metrics Derived From the 60 S Reference (PPG) Recordings.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8342/table-7
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Figure 3: Bland–Altman (BA) Plots Showing Levels of Agreement Between the SDNN/lnSDNN Values Derived From rPPG and Those Derived From the Reference (PPG) Signals.

English

Figure 5: Bland–Altman Plots Showing Agreement Between the rPPG- And Reference-Derived pNN50 From (A) the Average of All 30 S Recordings and (B) the 60 S Recordings.

English

Figure 4: Bland–Altman (BA) Plots Showing Agreements Between the RMSSD Values Derived From rPPG and Those Derived From the Reference (PPG) Signals. (A)–(C) Show the BA Plots for RMSSD Derived From (A) the Average of All 10 S Recordings, (B) the Average of All 30 S Recordings, and (C) the 60 S Recordings.

English

Table 3: Comparison of the Relative Changes in Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of SDNN, RMSSD, and pNN50 Before and After the IBI Filtering.

English

Electrophysiological Recordings From the Pharynx

WormBook
2006English

Table 3: LiDAR-derived Metrics for Estimating Biomass Parameters.

English

Electroretinographic Recordings From the Isolated and Superfused Murine Retina

2011English

Simultaneous Recordings of Action Potentials and Calcium Transients From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Cardiomyocytes

Biology Open
BiochemistryAgriculturalGeneticsMolecular BiologyBiological Sciences
2018English

Graphic Recordings From the 2015 Charleston Conference

Against the Grain
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy