Chapter 4. Can We Improve Our Conservation Bang for the Buck? Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Leatherback Turtle Conservation Strategies

doi 10.1515/9780824860196-006

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Authors

Publisher

University of Hawaii Press

Related search

The Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Prevention Targeting: How Much More Bang for the Buck?

American Journal of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
1996English

Conservation Education, Alternative Livelihood and Habitat Restoration: The Best Strategies for Conservation of Magombera Forest Reserve

Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology
2019English

Alternative Strategies for Amphibian Conservation: A Response to Muths & Fisher

Oryx
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsBehaviorLandscape Conservation
2016English

Using Better Management Thinking to Improve Conservation Effectiveness

ISRN Biodiversity
2013English

Cost Effectiveness of Alternative Subsidy Strategies for Soil Erosion Control

Journal of Agricultural & Applied Economics
AgriculturalEconomicsEconometricsBiological Sciences
1987English

The Alligator Snapping Turtle. Biology and Conservation

Copeia
EvolutionEcologySystematicsAnimal ScienceAquatic ScienceBehaviorZoology
1990English

Getting the Best Bang for Your Buck

English

Bang for Buck: Cost-Effective Control of Invasive Species With Different Life Histories

Ecological Economics
EconomicsEconometricsEnvironmental Science
2005English

Control Strategies for Energy Conservation :

1981English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy