Continuous Electronic Fetal Heart Monitoring Versus Intermittent Auscultation During Labor: Would the Literature Outcomes Have the Same Results if They Were Interpreted Following the NICHHD Guidelines?

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine - Poland
doi 10.17219/acem/103843
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Wroclaw Medical University

Related search

Intermittent Auscultation Versus Continuous Fetal Monitoring: Exploring Factors That Influence Birthing Unit Nurses’ Fetal Surveillance Practice Using Theoretical Domains Framework

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
GynecologyObstetrics
2017English

Continuous Electronic Fetal Monitoring During Labor: A Critique and a Reply to Contemporary Proponents

The Surgery Journal
2018English

Cardiotocography Versus Intermittent Auscultation of Fetal Heart on Admission to Labour Ward for Assessment of Fetal Wellbeing

2010English

Re: Admission Cardiotocography Versus Intermittent Auscultation of the Fetal Heart in Low-Risk Pregnancy During Evaluation for Possible Labour Admission-A Multicentre Randomised Trial: The ADCAR Trial

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in Midwifery Maternity Care During Labor

Nihon Ika Daigaku Igakkai Zasshi
2010English

Fetal Heart Rate Pattern Notification Guidelines and Suggested Management Algorithm for Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring

Permanente journal,The
Medicine
2007English

On Auscultation of the Heart During Chloroform Narcosis

BMJ
1896English

What Would Happen if Grant Reviews Were Made Public?

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2015English

Older Americans Would Work Longer if Jobs Were Flexible

American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy