The Evaluation of Cervical Spine Motion Below C2: A Comparison of Cineroentgenographic and Conventional Roentgenographic Methods

American Journal of Roentgenology - United States
doi 10.2214/ajr.115.1.148
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Roentgen Ray Society

Related search

Roentgenographic Evaluation of Osteoplastic Enlargement of the Cervical Canal

Orthopedics & Traumatology
1985English

Evaluation and Comparison of Statistical and Conventional Methods of Forecasting Avalanche Hazard

Journal of Glaciology
Earth-Surface Processes
1977English

A Comparison of Methods to Quantify Control of the Spine

Journal of Biomechanics
Sports MedicineSports ScienceBiophysicsOrthopedicsBiomedical EngineeringRehabilitation
2019English

Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Conventional Versus Minimally-Invasive Cervical Discectomy for Treatment of Severe Degenerative Disease at C5-C6: A Biomechanical Comparison Using a Model of the Full Cervical Spine and Finite Element Analysis

Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering
2011English

Cervical Spine Injury: Analysis and Comparison of Patients by Mode of Transportation

Journal of Emergency Medicine
Emergency Medicine
2013English

Importance of Nonlinear and Multivariable Flexibility Coefficients in the Prediction of Human Cervical Spine Motion

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Biomedical EngineeringPhysiology
2002English

Shoulder Traction Device for Enhanced Conventional Fluoroscopy During Cervical Spine Operations

Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica
SurgeryNeurology
2013English

Evaluation of Cervical Smears by Conventional and Liquid Based Cytology

Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy